• Xer0@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      7 months ago

      Nothing wrong with accepting that both sides of anything have good and bad shit going on. I couldn’t imagine just blindly following one side 100% even when they can also do questionable stuff.

      • samus12345@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        Sure, but the problem is that rather than arguing the finer points of how to combat climate change, for example, we have to argue about whether truth is truth.

    • WhiteHawk@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      11
      ·
      7 months ago

      Yes, because you’re so blinded by your indoctrination that you can’t accept the flaws of “your” side.

      • ImFresh3x@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        edit-2
        7 months ago

        “Climate change exists”

        “Religion shouldn’t allow governments to prevent basic healthcare needs”

        “January 6 was a failed insurrection”

        These are the things that the right calls indoctrination.

        And the hard left calls not important enough to bother voting.