I’m a Brit and over here its kind of funny to see American’s who Prep. Prep for alien invasion, prep for zombie outbreak, prep for Government oppression. It always seems to be slightly mad people who react this way, but just recently… maybe the last few years… I’ve followed the climate crisis in the news and tried to pick it apart.

It seems to me the fossil fuel/energy companies are gaslighting people, astroturfing just as the tobacco companies did in the past. We’ve had all this time (decades in fact) to transition. To adapt. Now we get this watered down deal that will see nothing really change.

So for me its time to store dry foods, toiletries, rainwater. Whatever I can afford. I will be secretly supplementing my electric with a small solar array I have bought with my overtime. Nothing massive, just 640w (two renogy panels as they have good reviews), and a small g99 inverter. The panels are hidden out back in a garden with the cable connected to grid via a long cable and into a switched inlet. I also have two friends who are doing the same as we’ve saved 5% of the cost buying together.

Things are already hard here. The last thing we need is for another load of panics but long term. People are already making their way here from other countries as their own are too dangerous, or their crops are failing. Imagine what it will be like when things get worse. We need to do our own thing now.

  • BodyBySisyphus [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    7 months ago

    This is a little pessimistic - there are still (non-loony) climate researchers who think that 2 C is achievable, but 2 C means that areas where over a billion people currently live will be functionally uninhabitable by the 2070’s. The largest permanent migration in human history is kicking off now and will be in high gear by mid-to-late century. So we’ve still got time to plan, and there is still a set of outcomes where the global north accommodates the refugee population and humanity finds its niche in a considerably less diverse but still livable Earth, but the work necessary to make that happen needs to start now, preferably without additional lethal obstacle courses on the US-Mexico border. Anyways I’m still contributing to my retirement fund but I frequently ask myself how much I’m going to need it.

    • Kaplya@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      but 2 C means that areas where over a billion people currently live will be functionally uninhabitable by the 2070’s.

      Hate to break it to you, but that’s what the bourgeoisie want: the “natural solution” to culling a billion poorest people on the planet to solve the over-population problem who are competing for resources with them.

        • SkingradGuard [he/him, comrade/them]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          7 months ago

          This is one reason I don’t believe the depopulation theory people throw around. Now, I know many in the bourgeoisie do talk about overpopulation, and I’m certain many do believe in social darwinist claptrap; but this contradiction that you mentioned makes me think there’s not really a unified effort by them to do it.

          I think it’s as simple as: doing something about climate change now would jeopardize their short term profits, and whatever happens in 2050 or 2070 won’t affect them personally.

    • voight [he/him, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      7 months ago

      Low income countries are planning how to survive, at least. Here? It will be like how we did the war on terror in the Sahel. They may try to protect important areas from the disasters while they lay waste to the populace at best