• n2burns@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    You’re doing exactly what I spoke about, oversimplifying!

    Every km you drive brings you a km closer to needing to change your oil, tires, brake pads, etc. You might only think of these expenses when you visit the mechanic, but they can be amortized out when you drive.

    Every km you drive decreases the resale value of your car. You might only see this when you sell the vehicle, but that’s part of the price calculation.

    EDIT My original comment got cut-off. I’ve completed my thought there.

      • n2burns@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Sorry, that’s just not true. Some costs are fixed, or have a minimum, but many depend on distance driven. Obviously whether the “majority” of costs are fixed depends on how much you drive/localized costs/etc, but very few people have the “vast majority” of their costs fixed.

        If you want sources, feel free to look it up yourself, but here are a few showing the breakdown of ownership

        P.S. You actually reminded me, insurance changes with how much you expect to drive! As well, driving more increases the odds that you’ll get into an accident, which can increase your premiums.

          • yA3xAKQMbq@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            The argument was not whether fixed cost exceed the variable cost or vice versa.

            The argument was that a lot of people severely underestimate the actual cost of any given trip because they only account for (a subset of) the variable costs (i.e. gas).

            And it’s true. Rarely anyone does full costing when it comes to cars because „the fixed cost are there no matter how much you drive“.

            • bluGill@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              @yA3xAKQMbq

              @fuck_cars @DontMindMe @Caradoc879 @n2burns @InquisitiveApathy

              the argument in this thread has been about if fixed vs variable costs where more. I fully agree cars are expensive no matter how you do the math, and most people underestimate it (in part by only considering gas). However I stand by my claim that once you have the car you may as well use it as the additional variable costs from all optional trips is tiny (I’m assuming that you have the car for some purpose that cannot be done by something else - towing the proverbial boat for example).