• makyo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    68
    ·
    1 year ago

    I hate everything about this: the lack of transparency, the lack of communication, the chaotic back and forth. We don’t know now if the company is now in a better position or worse.

    I know it leaves me feeling pretty sick and untrusting about it considering the importance and potential disruptiveness (perhaps extreme) of AI in the coming years.

    • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      Given the rumors he was fired based on undisclosed usage of some foreign data scraping company’s data, it ain’t looking good.

      Now that there’s big money involved, screw ethics. We don’t care how the training data was acquired.

      • PoisonedPrisonPanda@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Now that there’s big money involved, screw ethics. We don’t care how the training data was acquired.

        I dont care about ethics here, if the money would be excluded as well.

        IF they would live up to their goals they settled for its fine.

        But its similar to google, back in the days, with “dont be evil”.

        • Max-P@lemmy.max-p.me
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          11 months ago

          I’ve tried to find it but I can’t seem to find it. There’s been a thread on Lemmy somewhere about it that linked to a thread on Blind where someone claiming to be working at OpenAI having heard that from the board.

          But, it’s ultimately just rumors, we don’t know for sure. But it was at least pretty plausible and what I would expect the board of a very successful AI company to fire the CEO for, since the company is obviously doing really well right now.

    • Bipta@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Same here. I like Sam Altman but if the board removed him for a good reason and he was reinstated because the employees want payouts, humanity could be in big trouble.

    • FaceDeer@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I actually like the chaoticness, because I don’t like having one small group of people as the self-appointed and de-facto gatekeepers of AI for everyone else. This makes it clear to everyone why it’s important to control your own AI resources.

      • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Accelerationism is human sacrifice. It only works if it does damage… and most of the time, it only does damage.

            • FaceDeer@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              “Accelerationism” is a philosophical position. The goal is entirely what makes it accelerationism. Quit swapping words in each new comment.

              • mindbleach@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                For fuck’s sake. You want bad things to happen… so good things happen, later. Bad shit happening is the part that’s objectionable. Saying ‘but I want good things’ isn’t fucking relevant to why someone’s hassling you about this!

                The bad shit you want to happen first is the only part that’s real!

      • makyo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I’m with you there, I just hope the general public come to that realization.