• Pyre@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    2 years ago

    This is wonderful!
    I am curious how microbes obtain any nutritional benefits from such consumption.

    Aren’t plastics lacking in nutrients?

    • AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 years ago

      Well, plastics are organic molecules, so from a thermodynamic perspective, they’re not very different from biological polymers like proteins and carbohydrates.

      Polymers are defined as long, complex molecules that are made of a set of smaller subunits. Proteins are made of amino acids, carbohydrates are made of sugars, DNA, which is also a polymer, is made of nucleotides. Meanwhile, most plastics tell you what their subunits are right in the name: polyethylene, polypropylene, polyurethane, polyester, polystyrene, etc. Poly means “many”, and the other part is the chemical or class of chemical that are the subunits.

      Generally, it takes energy to turn the subunits into a polymer, and you get that energy back out when you break it back down. So the simplest source of energy that life can tap into comes from evolving an enzyme that can chop up the plastic. The bacteria might also be actually breaking down the individual subunits into even simpler molecules, like how simple sugars, once broken from carbohydrate chains, are further metabolized into carbon dioxide.

      Thermodynamically, the energy content of plastics can be demonstrated by burning them. They release energy when burned, which is a form of fast, uncontrolled breakdown. Bacteria simply do it in a slower, controlled manner.