• ryan@the.coolest.zone
    136·
    8 months ago

    Let him play in the legacy code. You can just hose him off later before letting him back into the office so he doesn’t track it everywhere.

    • ISometimesAdmin@the.coolest.zone
      65·
      8 months ago

      Unfortunately if you let Junior play in legacy code once, it’ll learn some nasty habits and make more of it from scratch, usually when you’re trying to sleep.

      • CodeMonkey@programming.dev
        10·
        8 months ago

        If you are creating an alternative implementation and leaving the old one in place, you are not fixing a problem, you are just creating a new one (and a third one because you have duplication of logic).

        Either refactor the old function so that it transparently calls the new logic or delete the old function and replace all the existing usage with usage of the new one. It does not need to happen as a single commit. You can check in the new function, tell everyone to use it, and clean up usage of the old one. If anyone tries to use the old implementation, call them out in a code review.

        If removing or replacing the old implementation is not possible, at least mark it as deprecated so that anyone using it gets a warning.

  • Bappity@lemmy.worldEnglish
    54·
    8 months ago

    me when first starting out at a job commenting everything I can
    VS
    me a couple years in completely lost because I never updated the comments and now none of them make any sense whatsoever

    • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
      60·
      8 months ago

      Commenting well is a highly advanced skill. I generally prefer no comments on code since it’s less likely to confuse people and I’ll merrily purge auto-doc comments and anything like

      // getId() returns an id

      That comment has negative value.

      • kubica@kbin.social
        24·
        8 months ago

        I can’t help it, I always get the mental image of hands clapping sarcastically when I see something like that.

      • Platypus@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
        10·
        8 months ago

        In my experience refactoring lots and lots of crappy code left by devs long gone, a dev who can write useful comments is by and large a dev who can write code clean and simple enough not to need them. If the code doesn’t have informative names and clear separation of concern, chances are a comment won’t help because the dev didn’t really know what they did that worked in the first place.

        • MagicShel@programming.dev
          14·
          8 months ago

          Generally, yes. However I have been known to document exactly why I’m doing something incredibly stupid - because it’s required but a stupid third party library which, despite being awful, is still better than implementing it myself as a refactor.

        • Bappity@lemmy.worldEnglish
          3·
          8 months ago

          a dev who can write useful comments is by and large a dev who can write code clean and simple enough not to need them.

          my boss is great in this regard and also always has to keep reminding us to write unit tests 😅

        • xmunk@sh.itjust.works
          18·
          8 months ago

          The best explanation I’ve ever heard is:

          Comments should state the ‘Why’ never the ‘What’.

          • hikaru755@feddit.de
            1·
            8 months ago

            There are some cases though where the code is just complicated for reasons outside of your control, in which case “what” comments are good - but they should never be taken at face value, but only used as a first step in understanding the code. There’s a significant risk of the code not actually doing what the comment says.

        • dukk@programming.dev
          3·
          8 months ago

          Yeah. Most of the time I use comments in my algorithms, as they often use some weird optimized black magic which are difficult to understand without comments.

      • Solar Bear@slrpnk.netEnglish
        6·
        8 months ago

        I write a lot of fairly simple scripts in Bash and PowerShell that should be easily understood by anybody else with moderate experience in the language, but I leave a lot of obvious comments because my coworkers don’t write any code and are extremely skittish about my automations. I add them basically to quell their fears.

          • Solar Bear@slrpnk.netEnglish
            7·
            8 months ago

            These are scripts that manage stuff on a few hundred user endpoints and a few servers. They were doing basically everything manually until I got here, and the only way I could get them on board with my slow introduction of automation is to let them see it. I have to ensure things don’t get too long, complex, or hard to explain, or they start getting nervous.

      • oce 🐆@jlai.lu
        4·
        8 months ago

        I’d rather teach people to comment well through my reviews. Much easier to understand two lines of well written function description in English than 20 lines of code.

  • magic_lobster_party@kbin.social
    291·
    8 months ago

    There’s also that long time senior dev who’s overly confident in their abilities and force pushes production breaking code directly to master.

  • ericbomb@lemmy.world
    16·
    8 months ago

    Look, it’s me.

    Just let me rewrite ONE report from scratch so it doesn’t check a specific unindexed table that it doesn’t actually need to check and causes the report to be killed by MSQL because it takes too long to run.

    Please just one rewrite. Please.

    Just one little crystal report.

    • justJanne@startrek.website
      7·
      8 months ago

      Often enough, the old code is so badly intertwined that it’s impossible to actually test. Those are the moments where all you can do is nuke it from orbit.

      • XTornado@lemmy.ml
        2·
        8 months ago

        Well I was going for that… They will surrender before they do any changes.