• ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    But if we just increase taxes, they won’t use it for more bombs and more raises for themselves, they’ll solve all the worlds problems!

  • Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Like the second was ever going to happen, even without the first one.

    The real second option is “cut taxes for our rich mates”.

  • OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    37
    ·
    1 year ago

    Does helping the homeless population really benefit the country though? Why should they get free handouts? I worked hard to pay rent, they should too.

    What I’m trying to say is yes, we should keep bombing the Middle East.

        • nephs
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Welcome to the Internet. Signal the joke clearly so that you are not confused with stupid extremists. Joke’s still there, and it’s clear and unambiguous.

          https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Poe’s_law

          Poe’s law is an adage of internet culture which says that, without a clear indicator of the author’s intent, any parodic or sarcastic expression of extreme views can be mistaken by some readers for a sincere expression of those views.[1][2][3] The law is frequently exploited by individuals who share genuine extremist views and, when faced with overwhelming criticism, deflect by insisting they were merely being satirical.

    • grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      What kind of sadistic fucking moron do you have to be to prefer that the government spend more money persecuting and incarcerating the homeless than it would on treating and housing them?