As far as I could tell in the movie the rich people were depicted as decent parents if not a bit naive, while the poor family were backstabbing assholes who betrayed their fellow workers (the housekeeper and her husband) because of sheer malice. Not once does the film hint at the underlying economical system as the reason why the rich are rich and the poor are poor.

If you are a socialist, you will (correctly) identify capitalism as the reason for the misery of the poor people in the film, and the rich as part of the bourgeoisie who exploit them. But that isn’t any different than analysing an IRL crime through that lens, the film didn’t help you reach that conclusion, it just presented a scenario.

A chud could easily see the rich family as the honest entrepreneurs and the poor family as poor because of the negative behaviors they exhibited, and there is nothing in the film that would dispute that interpretation.

With the poor family getting punished for their deception, and the son resolving to make money to save his father at the end (presumably through more “honest” means), it even displays the “pull yourself by the bootstraps” belief.

The best case interpretation of the film I can make is that “the rich people should be more conscious of the poor’s struggles, and the poors should stay in their place or risk losing everything” which is pretty reactionary and not the class conscious film many people described it as. I guess you could see the ending as punishment for the class betrayal but I think that’s a stretch.

Am I overzealous in policing the politics of the media I consume to the point of misinterpreting things or finding an even vaguely leftist film that hard?

  • Huldra [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    1 year ago

    Is that what he does? I’m not sure I ever really saw it that way, the brutality seemed to me to be pretty straightforwardly a symptom of police incompetence and it just fucks up their investigation more and more until they are so out of leads that even the guy who acted like he was the smug smart cop who cares about evidence, is about to just murder someone and put the blame on him anyways.

    • Abracadaniel [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 year ago

      I watched this again recently and you’re right, the violence is really just incompetence. Their abuse of suspects interferes with solving the case more than helping it.

    • RyanGosling [none/use name]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      guy who acted like he was the smug smart cop who cares about evidence, is about to just murder someone and put the blame on him anyways.

      At the end, he tried to do his optical pat down as well, but then realized he doesn’t know shit and stares at the audience because he knows that the killer outsmarted him and is probably watching