based on #12680 but some reductions: some cases were already changed by vim/vim (just according to keikaku) focus on direct mention of the user which was the major concern.
This is not a bad thing (from a purely practical standpoint, s/he just hurts my eyes while they doesn’t), but is a minor, essentially grammar fix of a documentation worthy of a post? I don’t think.
The words we use reflect our values, or so some people say… depending on your perspective too. As someone who really enjoys language, this is absolutely worthy of a post. If you don’t think something is “worthy” of a post just scroll past it
In the PR, i found 8 cases where only male pronouns were used. So i think this is obviously sexist? I guess you sure would think this is sexist when only female pronouns would be used?
That’s a wrongful assumption about me, the last thing I care about in life is what pronouns people use to refer to me. Again, I just think this is a really minor change
This is not a bad thing (from a purely practical standpoint, s/he just hurts my eyes while they doesn’t), but is a minor, essentially grammar fix of a documentation worthy of a post? I don’t think.
The words we use reflect our values, or so some people say… depending on your perspective too. As someone who really enjoys language, this is absolutely worthy of a post. If you don’t think something is “worthy” of a post just scroll past it
In the PR, i found 8 cases where only male pronouns were used. So i think this is obviously sexist? I guess you sure would think this is sexist when only female pronouns would be used?
see https://github.com/neovim/neovim/pull/14582/files#diff-39ce7fc6897bf0e742a197cdeee45ecef2d3590ece65cce1047b6864d0e4efa8R1878 for one
That’s a wrongful assumption about me, the last thing I care about in life is what pronouns people use to refer to me. Again, I just think this is a really minor change
deleted by creator