is it a formatting step that an image goes through when uploaded? I’m tired of converting image after image back into jpg, so if there’s like a step I can take to avoid it being a webp, it would help to know

  • Treczoks@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    1 year ago

    Just a few weeks ago, they found a big security flaw in webp and webm. Which affected nearly all programs using it, because they all use the same library.

    Webp and webm are simply not mature enough for professional use.

    • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Web images should be converted to png, then, never jpg (unless they’re actual photos).

      • VindictiveJudge@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I don’t see a reason to convert to jpg even for photos. Its advantages are related to the way compression artifacts looked more natural than the compression artifacts of contemporary formats. Why save as a format that’s prone to obvious compression artifacts at all anymore?

        • brianorca@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 year ago

          Depends if you are aiming for best quality for a given file size, or if you don’t care how big the file is.

        • LillyPip@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Jpg has some advantages with photos, because it takes advantage of pixel fuzzing which isn’t visually noticeable in photos and can contribute greatly to higher compression.
          It’s objectively terrible for everything else, though (because of the pixel fuzzing).