there is no evidence indicating that the US is developing biological weapons in Ukraine
What is wrong with you? Under what conditions would it make sense for the US government to fund and collaboratively operate biolabs in Ukraine, at the border of Russia, after a coup that was pretty clearly infiltrated by US interests, that ultimately brought neo-nazis into a legitimate role in the state?
What capabilities could they possibly have in Ukraine that don’t exist elsewhere and aren’t besieged by violent threats to both operations and to infrastructure and to supply chain?
The only thing Ukraine has going for it is that it’s not on US soil, is willing to absolve the US of any wrongdoings in order to get into NATO, and there’s already an active espionage infrastructure in place including CIA black sites.
If they’re not developing bioweapons, then they’re either operating a red herring or they’re operating the most ham-fisted “cancer research” lab ever concocted.
u/roosterkun - originally from r/GenZhou
First of all, plausible reasons why something may exist is not the same thing as evidence for it existing.
Hasn’t the last 2 years of C19 highlighted a good reason for biological research facilities to exist around the world? The US has labs of that very sort in 25 countries around the world, the only reason Ukraine is presently highlighted is because they’re involved in a war.
The fact that it’s funded by the DOD is something I was made aware of only by this thread, and it does cast suspicion as to the intented purpose of the lab, but again: that is not the same thing as evidence.
We are not in a court of law, we are disempowered capitalist subjects living in the imperial core and constantly force-fed propaganda. Your demand for hard concrete evidence despite all of the constant patterns around you is a ridiculous way of navigating the world.
All of these things were known long after they were true. The evidence of immediate things is simply not accessible. We have to rely on patterns and on the known facts about strategies, tactics, capabilities, and laws of motion.
u/FaustTheBird - originally from r/GenZhouWhat is wrong with you? Under what conditions would it make sense for the US government to fund and collaboratively operate biolabs in Ukraine, at the border of Russia, after a coup that was pretty clearly infiltrated by US interests, that ultimately brought neo-nazis into a legitimate role in the state?
What capabilities could they possibly have in Ukraine that don’t exist elsewhere and aren’t besieged by violent threats to both operations and to infrastructure and to supply chain?
The only thing Ukraine has going for it is that it’s not on US soil, is willing to absolve the US of any wrongdoings in order to get into NATO, and there’s already an active espionage infrastructure in place including CIA black sites.
If they’re not developing bioweapons, then they’re either operating a red herring or they’re operating the most ham-fisted “cancer research” lab ever concocted.
u/roosterkun - originally from r/GenZhouFirst of all, plausible reasons why something may exist is not the same thing as evidence for it existing.
Hasn’t the last 2 years of C19 highlighted a good reason for biological research facilities to exist around the world? The US has labs of that very sort in 25 countries around the world, the only reason Ukraine is presently highlighted is because they’re involved in a war.
The fact that it’s funded by the DOD is something I was made aware of only by this thread, and it does cast suspicion as to the intented purpose of the lab, but again: that is not the same thing as evidence.
u/FaustTheBird - originally from r/GenZhouWe are not in a court of law, we are disempowered capitalist subjects living in the imperial core and constantly force-fed propaganda. Your demand for hard concrete evidence despite all of the constant patterns around you is a ridiculous way of navigating the world.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip (protection of Nazis)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eugenics_in_the_United_States#Sterilization_of_Latina_women (sterilization of non-white women through the 1970s)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abu_Ghraib_torture_and_prisoner_abuse
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Five_Eyes (spying on citizens and sharing the information with allies to evade posse comitatus)
https://theweek.com/speedreads/835854/john-bolton-says-monroe-doctrine-alive-well-history-shows-why-thats-controversial-statement (The Monroe Doctrine is alive and well)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Death_squad#United_States (Death squads used by the US)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biological_warfare#United_States (publicly known and filtered biowar programs)
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Niger_uranium_forgeries (yellow cake lie)
All of these things were known long after they were true. The evidence of immediate things is simply not accessible. We have to rely on patterns and on the known facts about strategies, tactics, capabilities, and laws of motion.