I love the convenience of not having to create a password everywhere I need to be authenticated. It would be interesting to be able to use lemmy instead of feeding more information to these big corporations.

    • poVoq@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Yes, but that is not how Oauth2/OIDC works (the old OpenID did, but it has been largely abandoned).

      One of the reason this approach was abandoned is that these external login automations are very easily abused for spam if you allow arbitrary instances as the auth endpoint.

      • neutron@thelemmy.club
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        So this is why we’ve been seeing rows of “Login with $SpecificProvider” instead of a universal format using username@provider as we all hoped?

        • poVoq@slrpnk.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The old OpenID didn’t see much uptake (because of the spam issue) and the alternative Oauth2 that was AFAIK mostly pushed by Google is clearly designed for the purpose of large centralized providers. So I don’t think there is a direct causality, but yes it is related.

          Never the less Oauth2/OIDC works quite well and is clearly better that most of the alternatives still commonly in use.

      • fbmac@lemmy.fbmac.netOP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        you could accept logins only from instances that have enough trust on fediseer, I think this would work better than the old openid