• vector_zero@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Why not? If you feed the entirety of a given IP (say, every frame in every Star Wars film or show), you could train an AI to produce imagery derived exclusively from copyrighted material.

    • NounsAndWords@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think the final product and the ideas and concepts that it holds are the important aspect for copyright.

      If I cut up a Star Wars poster into 1,000,000 tiny pieces, and then reassemble them into a self portrait with no reference whatsoever to Star Wars and sell it, would I have committed copyright infringement?

      If I did the same thing but made a stormtrooper out of the pieces, is the copyright issue with the source material, or the final product?

      • MoogleMaestro@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        Both in that case are a copyright violation, depending on which images your source. Collages are a frequent example of this, it’s already an answered problem.

        • bioemerl@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          Collages when used in a transformative way are not a copyright violation. It’s mostly a case by case thing because people will make a “collage” that is just an image with some sparkles around it.

          The example you’re responding to where you make a picture of your face would almost certainly not be considered a copyright violation.