The Report of the Committee Appointed by the Royal Society to Consider of the Best Method of Adjusting the Fixed Points of Thermometers; And of the Precautions Necessary to Be Used in Making Experiments with Those Instruments
Seems fancy and legit, I see no reason to actually read it and confirm the info.
I like this version better than “he had a fever when he measured 100 degrees” so I will choose to believe it without further research.
I hope you are correct.
I largely agree. Whether or not something “is art” is almost entirely subjective. But I can literally tell an LMM to “make an art” without any actual direction and it will make something. Does that make it less a work of art? It kind of feels like it to me. But if I ask that 50 times and then pick the one I like best, does that change it’s artistic ‘value’? I can collect a pile of rocks I think look cool and the collection could certainly be considered artistic, and collages are a thing, so there is certainly a lot of gray area there.
I like to think of art as more an activity that an object. If I experience it and it makes me feel things, it is art. If I create something based on my internal feelings, it is art. Maybe art is just the feelings we generate along the way?
Your interpretation of what is art is based on the perspective of the viewer. The article seems to be defining it more in the context of the creating and the intentions/choices behind the creation. Both are valid.
If AI generated images are art, then a naturally occurring crystal cave that elicits a sense of awe is also art. Maybe that’s true, I just think it has more to do with how you define art than some objective reality of what is ‘art’.
I think that really depends how you define art…which I think is the point of the article.
Imagine having to make up an entire series of math lectures just to cover up your search history.
Low and middle-income countries in Asia face significant disparities in scientific capacity and ability to influence public policy, which is likely to affect responses to future pandemics, climate change and technological advancements such as Artificial Intelligence, according to the International Network for Government Science Advice (INGSA).
I originally read the title as “it is more difficult to influence public policy in least-developed countries based on this study” but it appears it’s actually “it is more difficult for scientists to advocate for science-backed policies in least-developed countries.”
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Ones_Who_Walk_Away_from_Omelas
For anyone who doesn’t get the reference
“Are you suggesting coconuts migrate?”
Gotta go fast!
-Ancient Middle Eastern Philosopher, probably
Nope
And now I want to know the deep meaning behind all of those Chinese knockoff tee shirts that I thought were just poorly translated.
No no no, we need to dig down to the magma to release the pressure!
Cheap client not willing to pay for proper materials and a good carpenter who didn’t care enough to argue with them about it would be my guess.
Technically, it is very much linear. It’s just it doesn’t always go the way we feel like it should.
I would mostly be confused based on my lack of any programming experience.
Everything I know about Barbados involves limbo competitions in the year 3,000…
It’s probably indigestion from all that food
So you’re telling me if I stop breathing I’ll never get older? I’m in!