Anti-vaccine activist Robert F. Kennedy Jr. is expected to announce Monday that he will drop his Democratic bid for president and run as an independent or third-party candidate, adding a new wrinkle to a 2024 race currently heading toward a rematch between President Joe Biden and former President Donald Trump.

Kennedy’s campaign has teased the announcement in the days leading up to a Monday afternoon speech in Philadelphia. In a recent video, Kennedy said there is corruption “in the leadership of both political parties” and said he wants to “rewrite the assumptions and change the habits of American politics.”

The video came shortly after Mediaite reported he planned to launch an independent bid.

  • Archer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    9 months ago

    Yeah if third party candidates were actually serious they would work to get ranked choice voting passed then run

    • centof@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      That is exactly what the Forward party is doing. Their top political policy position is promoting ranked choice voting.

      • Archer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I have deep, intense skepticism of anything Andrew Yang touches or endorses

        EDIT: Also look at the fucking wikipedia article for the “Forward Party”. It’s literally bankers and Republicans, if I wanted to ruin the country this sounds like a great idea

        • centof@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I have deep, intense skepticism of anything Andrew Yang touches or endorses

          Okay, I have deep, intense skepticism of any current politician.

          It’s literally bankers and Republicans

          No, its not literally bankers and Republicans. All you have to do is look at the Notable member chart to see that. It does have some republicans who have joined which isn’t exactly a surprise since they are 33% of the country. As far as bankers, there was no mention of the word banker in the article so not sure where you’re getting that.

          Why are you cursing about an wikipedia article? Is it because you are angry at it?

          • Archer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Forward_Party_(United_States)

            “On July 27, 2022, the Forward Party announced that it had merged with the Serve America Movement and the Renew America Movement to further its effort to form a new third party named “Forward”.”

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Serve_America_Movement

            “The Serve America Movement (SAM) was a big tent political organization founded in 2017 by Morgan Stanley lawyer Eric Grossman.”

            https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Renew_America_Movement

            “The Renew America Movement (RAM) was an American political group founded in 2021 by former staffers from Republican Party administrations”

            If you give them money you’re just giving Republicans money, full stop. I support RCV but I wouldn’t trust any of these fuckers for a second. Knew that website looked way too slick

            • centof@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 months ago

              Got it. You think anything republican is impure therefore bad. Essentially you think to be good you must not associate with bad people. It is for or against. There is no grey area. You have to meet my purity test of not being a bad person so I can support you.

              Sorry, but the world is not black and white. There is a gray area. The reality is that politics to the average person is no different than a rooting for team sport. By advocating for ranked choice voting you seem to be willing to step out of that viewpoint a little, but you still think all republicans are bad.

              PS: when you cuss it just lets me know you are dehumanizing the people you are referring to. So I try to somewhat ignore that as I do not support dehumanizing people.

              • Archer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                If “purity test” is not supporting the people and party who overtly supported the overthrow of the United States government and continue to do so, then yeah I use purity tests. Also I can curse all I fucking want

                • centof@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  The people and party are two different things. There are 50+ million republicans. It is a mistake to assume that they all support what happened on Jan 6.

                  Most of them are probably just uninformed or misinformed and therefore support their team. Just because some republicans did actively support Jan 6 doesn’t mean they all support it. Mostly, they just chose to ignore headlines because they do not like the cognitive dissonance it causes.

        • centof@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          9 months ago

          I have deep, intense skepticism of anything Andrew Yang touches or endorses

          Why? I am curious why you are skeptical of him. He is literally doing what you suggested. Why are you mistrustful of him?

          • Archer@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            9 months ago

            He’s a naive idiot who thinks business skill translates into political skill (always amusing to watch those types toss themselves into the wood chipper of primaries), and he did a vanity/brand run for President in 2020, then basically publicly admitted he got rolled by Biden’s team with his endorsement. Any of these is disqualifying. He doesn’t know what he’s doing, and he’s not serious about it.

            • centof@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              So you are mistrustful of him because you don’t think hes qualified to be president. That is a reasonable rationale for distrust.

              He doesn’t know what he’s doing

              No one always knows what they are doing, that is part of being an imperfect human. That he admits it to some degree just means he is being honest about his skills and abilities and is willing to learn.

              Anyway you are entitled to think someone is not qualified for president if you want. However, that does not disqualify that he is at least trying to do exactly what you think should be done.

              • Archer@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                9 months ago

                He’s surrounding himself with people so fundamentally untrustoworthy that it absolutely needs to be called out no matter what he says his goals are

                • centof@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  9 months ago

                  So why should I trust you when you call someone untrustworthy? You keep calling people names and that doesn’t exactly lead me to trust you. Trust is in the eye of the beholder and your cussing doesn’t exactly lead me to trust your viewpoint.

                  Objectively Yang and everyone on the list of 20+ notable member are more trustable to the general public than you simply because they are important enough to be mentioned by a Wikipedia entry. There are 14 democrats and 13 republicans listed on the notable member chart.

                  You don’t have to trust everyone in an organization to trust that organization. I would rather support an organization that might be lying over 2 organizations that I know are lying.

                  Anyway, I understand your viewpoint and can respect it even if I happen to see it differently. Thanks for explaining your view.