• Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would very much like my fellow voters to be able to read and understand things before making a decision.

        In Athens they gave political offices away in a lottery. (Slaves and women excepted, of course.) This meant that because the stupidest person in the city could randomly get the highest office, they had a reason to make sure everybody was at least a little competent.

        • Primarily0617@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          1 year ago

          What exactly would you like them to read and understand that requires a reading level above 6th grade level?

          • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            1 year ago

            Proposed and actual legislation. Complex articles about the implications of policy decisions. Scientific and medical articles. Anything that can produce an informed electorate is what they should be able to read, and most of that is well above a sixth grade level.

            • prowess2956@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              1 year ago

              I’m really enjoying you trying to change the mind of someone who is clearly three fifth graders in a trench coat.

              • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                1 year ago

                My hope is that somebody else reading the exchange will see the depths of the ignorance of OP. Because they’re pretty fucking dumb.

            • Primarily0617@kbin.social
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              Why on earth do you think high reading level is a skill that correlates with the ability to parse legislation? I’ve literally had somebody trained in law try to explain specific laws to me and be completely wrong. Knowing long words isn’t going to help you. A similar argument applies for your other examples.

              If you’re reading a technical document aimed at professionals in the field, I literally don’t care what your reading level is: you’re probably not going to correctly parse the text unless you have the background knowledge the text assumes you have.

              If you’re reading an article aimed at a general audience, then congratulations: it’s already written in a way that you can understand it, because it’s aimed at a general audience. If nobody could read it, nobody would buy it.

              • Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                1 year ago

                Why on earth do you think high reading level is a skill that correlates with the ability to parse legislation? I’ve literally had somebody trained in law try to explain specific laws to me and be completely wrong. Knowing long words isn’t going to help you. A similar argument applies for your other examples.

                If you think that reading level is just “long words” then your literature teachers completely failed you, and I’m sorry.

                If you’re reading a technical document aimed at professionals in the field, I literally don’t care what your reading level is: you’re not going to correctly parse the text unless you have the background knowledge the text assumes you have.

                If you have a high enough reading level you can do further research to learn what the experts know. You can read multiple sources and make your own connections. You don’t have to trust someone just because they say they have expert knowledge - you can check them.

                If you’re reading an article aimed at a general audience, then congratulations: it’s already written in a way that you can understand it, because it’s aimed at a general audience. If nobody could read it, nobody would buy it.

                So if most people can only read at a 2nd grade level it’s okay for journalists to write articles like See Dog Run? How are we supposed to communicate complicated ideas without complex language?

              • Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I’ve literally had somebody trained in law try to explain specific laws to me and be completely wrong.

                Do you have a sixth grade reading level? Otherwise I don’t think this helps your argument. Meaning, your sixth grade + reading level helped you best the lawyer.

      • Very_Bad_Janet@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        At least where I live in the US, voters are asked to vote on city or state ballot proposals. These proposals appear on the ballot in a wall of text. They are also usually available online before election day for interested voters to read. These can be very complicated to parse - not only the language and technical terms in the text, but the policy itself and how it might affect different groups of stakeholders in the community and different existing policies and competing proposals. A voter might need to read a lot of news articles and opinion pieces to get the lay of the land on a particular issue. I think having a higher than sixth grade reading level would be more than helpful in understanding an issue and related ballot proposals.