I like a lot of the communities on that instance, but every once in a while I just get hit with a random wave of toxicity by them for no reason. For example, there was a post asking which communities from Reddit do you wish existed on Lemmy, and I answered honestly saying more car related communities as they are one of my hobbies, and I got severely downvoted and got replied to with “there is a FuckCars community” There are other times in the past where something similar happened in a lemmy.ml community, where I said something that was 100% non-offensive, non-argumentative, and non-political but got mass down voted for no reason. I have not had this problem anywhere else however. Does anyone else have a similar experience or no?

  • nicolairathjen@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    22
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    9 months ago

    It seems like a lot of Lemmy users are slightly radical american “leftists”. This is an example of this on Lemmy.world. It seems that some users see Lemmy as a forum for politicly “left”-leaning americans, not a general purpose forum. Maybe some people prefer an echo chamber?

    • Redredme@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      9 months ago

      “slightly”.

      That’s being very nice. The correct word would be anarchist.

      • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        I haven’t seen a single anarchist on Lemmy. Not even one.

        The most obvious group, and the one this thread is about, is about as far as it’s possible to get from being anarchists.

        • Redredme@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          “eat the rich” “destroy the institutions”

          Etc… That’s not left. Insinuating killing it destroying societies is, by definition, anarchist.

          Socialism, Communism are about change, not control or jealousy.

          • Rottcodd@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            No - anarchism, by definition, is the complete absence of institutionalized authority.

            Those around here who are calling for the destruction of institutions have no intention of creating a society free from the hierarchy of authority - they want to destroy the current authority merely so that they can replace it with their own.

            Again, they’re about as far as it’s possible to get from being anarchists. They’re as authoritarian as fascists - they just have a different set of norms they want to forcibly impose, and a different set of people they’re eager to oppress and murder along the way.

    • Microw@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Some lemmy instances are explicitly leftist and that’s something we all just need to accept. You can block those instances or you interact with them, but it’s not anyone’s place to tell an instance how to do things on their own server. There are general purpose instances as well.

    • V17@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      This is especially true for lemmy.ml. Political arguments and circlejerking sometimes start in completely unrelated topics and comments literally saying that every right winger is a fascist get lots of upvotes. It’s like a distilled version of some far left subreddits.

    • azurefirefly@lemmy.basedcount.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      14
      ·
      9 months ago

      I hate the political landscape on Lemmy. The fact that their are people who are unironically communists shows the lack of political maturity in those groups