• chiliedogg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    9 months ago

    I think you misunderstood.

    “Engaged to wait” simply means that you aren’t free to leave and must be paid. If you’re required to be at work, you need to be paid - even if you’re killing time playing cards.

    • Lemminary@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      I see, but the other commenter didn’t say that anybody left, that they were only playing cards.

          • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            9 months ago

            I think you’re agreeing with me.

            I’m saying it’s illegal to deny them their pay because they were required to be at work. “Engaged to wait” basically means “Having nothing to do, but still on the clock.”

            If they showed up to work 20 minutes early to play cards or we’re playing cards during their lunch break, then they’d be “waiting to be engaged” which wouldn’t require payment because they’re free to leave.

            • Lemminary@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Yeah, I don’t think I was disagreeing, I only wasn’t sure what you meant but I think I get it now.