• Lemminary@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    I see, but the other commenter didn’t say that anybody left, that they were only playing cards.

        • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          9 months ago

          I think you’re agreeing with me.

          I’m saying it’s illegal to deny them their pay because they were required to be at work. “Engaged to wait” basically means “Having nothing to do, but still on the clock.”

          If they showed up to work 20 minutes early to play cards or we’re playing cards during their lunch break, then they’d be “waiting to be engaged” which wouldn’t require payment because they’re free to leave.

          • Lemminary@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            Yeah, I don’t think I was disagreeing, I only wasn’t sure what you meant but I think I get it now.