• Nakoichi [they/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    1 year ago

    How I learned to defeat fascism with the power of love:

    Chapter one:
    Realizing you cannot stop fascism with the power of love.

    Chapter two:
    The power of incredible violence.

  • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    13
    ·
    1 year ago

    This is like the 3rd or 4th comic from this artist with the same message, same punchline, and same structure. We get it, Jennie.

      • pimento64@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        6
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah. The ones who are capable of getting it already got it before the comics were made. The ones who don’t get it are already lost. Nothing important is being done here. We could all go an entire century without the creation of even more more little bit of trite, sanctimonious political proselytization and the course of human development would be literally 100.0% identical because that’s what happens when you shovel your opinion into a hypersaturated market for that opinion.

  • WorldWideLem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    1 year ago

    The problem with those panels, in my opinion, isn’t the defense of free speech itself, it’s ending the conversation with a defense of free speech. This shifts the discussion away from how awful those other ideas are and instead distracts people with a debate over free speech itself.

    If you truly want to support a free marketplace of ideas you have to be an active participant, you can’t expect others to pick up the bullhorn for good in your place.

    • Manmoth@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Ironically the ‘paradox’ of ‘Tolerance of intolerance’ kind of argues for people self-selecting into groups which is anti-thetical to the intent lol.

  • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    A society that values free speech rejects Mustache’s philosophy. He never gains enough of a following in panel 1, 2, or 3 to be able to enact panel 4.

    As soon as we allow ourselves to silence someone, Mustache can use the same argument to justify silencing Black Shirt. When we allow ourselves to suppress an enemy of society, Mustache merely needs to suggest to us that Black Shirt is such an enemy.

    The insidious part of fascism is that by the time we get to Panel 4, we are the ones carrying Black Shirt to the gallows.

    • racsol@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      I couldn’t have said it better.

      You have dictatorships you would not identify stereotypically as fascist, yet they silence anyone dangerous by calling them a fascist. Oldest trick in the book.

      A very simple test: A f*ing fascist could use the same comic to justify repressing communists in a fascist regime. It just has to replace those “fascists” believes by communist ones.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 year ago

        This is what worries me about large centralized platforms. They normalize the idea that offensive speakers should be silenced, or should be able to silence dissent. They shouldn’t. They should be challenged or ignored. You can block an individual, controlling what you listen to. You can urge others to ignore them. But it should be a cringeworthy act of authoritarianism to lay down a banhammer and block someone from speaking.

        The offensive, intolerant asshole should not be banning dissenters; dissenters should not be banning assholes. Any banning anywhere should be seen as deeply troubling, and only done openly, publicly, and with the consent and agreement of the community.

        Unilateral control over the process should be seen as fascism.

        I am thrilled at the decentralized nature of Lemmy effectively eliminating that capability.

  • Rindel@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    Remember that there is no paradox of tolerance if you treat it as a social contract instead of a moral issue: Those who do not abide by it are not protected by it.

    • beteljuice@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This assumes there is some clearly defined line of what is intolerance that everyone agrees on. For a while at the company I worked at, just being a white male was considered “intolerant”, so they fired many of them. The irony was not lost on the employees. It was a very oppressive environment and I’m glad it recovered. It’s a famous company that aired some of this dirty laundry publically so you might be able to guess who it is.

      Some people are black and white bigots like this comic, but people are stupid binary thinkers and call people out as intolerant who are not overtly bigoted or bigoted at all, but are of the wrong identity or associate with the wrong groups.

      This comic is basically a straw man.

  • halfempty@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    There is no paradox of tolerance if you treat it as a social contract. Those who do not abide by the contract are not protected by it.

  • spiderwort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    5 months ago

    Ideology reflects emotion. Angry people adopt angry ideology. Find a justification for anger and somebody to hate.

    Cure the anger and the ideology disappears.

  • spiderwort@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    5 months ago

    Note the nice uniforms. They don’t grow on trees. These guys are funded.