Surely the shame will cause her to resign immediately.

  • bazus1@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I, for one, welcome this new definition of Traditional American Family Values!

  • BarqsHasBite@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    57
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Boebert’s boyfriend can be seen groping the congresswoman’s breasts. Boebert takes his hand and pulls it closer to her breasts as she turns to speak into his ear. The Republican congresswoman then puts her hands on her date’s crotch and appears to rub his penis.

    Boebert and the Republican Party have frequently touted that they represent “traditional family values.”

  • Cruxifux@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    44
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Lol wtf

    These people make laws in the greatest military power the world has ever seen.

    America, get your shit together. You’re an embarrassment.

    • TwoGems@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      If we’d actually bother to use the 14th amendment on them we could get rid of them maybe

  • jerkface@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    I have never seen any indication that Boebert has experienced a moment of shame in her life. She’s pathological.

    • evidences@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      36
      ·
      1 year ago

      I mean the dude was jacking it in a porn theater, at least Paul Rubens was in the appropriate theater for his actions.

  • krayj@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    21
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    Can’t wait to hear how her supporters choose to defend this (and her other behavior at this event). I’m sure they’ve already internally justified it to themselves.

  • SeaJ@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    1 year ago

    Her loud singing must have sounded an awful lot like moaning.

    • SeaJ@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      There is zero actual evidence she was a call girl. She is a piece of shit but let’s not spread misogynistic garbage.

      • j4k3@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’ve only seen headlines in passing taken at face value because I do not care deeper than this about someone with no depth and shit takes on real solutions. Given her behavior I’ve observed in other headlines, she does what I would label as “call girl {person} politics.” Still, I edited the post as “deleted” as I do not have ties to propaganda machines or desire to reinforce one. There are plenty of people removed for the highest bidders on both sides of the manufactured political circus show and it isn’t limited to any affiliation, race, or gender.

    • flippant@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      They’re probably proud of her, but they don’t vote for her. Her district is mostly western CO and wraps around south and east to Pueblo, but Woodland Park’s rep is Doug Lamborn.

  • jerkface@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    71
    ·
    1 year ago

    The pearl-clutching coverage is fucking bullshit. Yes, point out her hypocrisy and lies, but claims like “x-rated behaviour” are obvious slander, in a situation so horrid that no fucking slander is even necessary. Its like they just cannot help themselves. They are not our saviours, they’re just the devil waiting in the wings.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago
      1. it’s snippet meant to generate clicks
      2. her tits were in full view of kids as some dude groped the shit out of them and she returned the favor on his dick.

      X-rated is fairly mild here.

      • I_Fart_Glitter@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        I think for the X rating you actually have to see penis entering an orifice. R rating is genitals in full view. Fondling over the clothes… I dunno… PG 13? Maybe R? Apparently there is some cabal of old white men who decide the ratings, not me.

        I do think it’s worse than the candidate who was recently outed for having sex with her husband for tips on Chatturbate. Only consenting adults saw those two getting freaky. Bobert was “fiddling” in front of people who just wanted to watch Beetlejuice.