They’re pretty useful for sharing wifi logins in person for smartphones, for example.

What, supernatural tales from a 2000 year old book not enough for you?

You’re using HTTPS, do you have child porn?

It’s E2EE from the sender to your Beeper server, where it’s decrypted, then re-encypted as a Matrix message.

Then it’s not E2E encrypted.

One end is your device, the other end is the other device. It’s only E2E encrypted if it is not decrypted until it reaches the other device.

You can try Syncthing.

It doesn’t need a seperate server, messing with port forwarding, etc, just a similar setup to onedrive.

Plus, since it’s just syncing files, all your data is private, and you don’t need to worry about buying more cloud storage space.

Feel free to message me if you need help with it.

And the UK goverment really REALLY wants to have backdoors put into every kind on encryption.

Well, I’m sure the two aren’t related.

You completely missed the point.

Just because your family is nice to you, doesn’t mean the south isn’t full of racists and bigots (and also that your family isn’t part of them).

Dunno where you live but the usa is a matriachy.

Women have more rights than men.

No wonder you fit in better in the south.

Or, maybe there’s another way…

Oh course there is, it’ very obvious.

Are people really not seeing it?

You just hang the candidate upside down so he sees his update down notes the right way…

Sheesh.

Wow, this post must have hit a nerve, huh.

“But the KKK is nice to me, why is everybody so mad at them? Can’t we just all get along? It’s not ok ho hate a group of people or a culture as a whole!”

Oh look, christians are trying to restrict consentual sex while helping and hiding rapists and pedos.

Wow, couldn’t see that coming.

Privileged drives and economilcally-and-socially-disadvanted-due-to-historical-injustices drives. The last ones a bit of a mouthful, so you can use EASDDTHJ drives.

Blame the borderline pornographic books that activists have been pushing on children for this response.

I know, right? When will those activists finally stop pushing the bible on kids??

Well, if he were truly omnipotent (and real), he could have created free will that doesn’t go against logic and without suffering.

He resigned immediately after making a culturally insensitive sentence to avoid vultures, and a vulture is swooping after him to capitalize on his poor judgment.

Okay, let’s not pretend it was a single misinterpreted sentence, and now poor Ashton is unfairly hounded.

Jesus doesn’t do that. Jesus does the opposite of that.

Exactly, jesus wouldn’t say something like that or this:

“Do not think that I came to bring peace on earth. I did not come to bring peace but a sword. For I have come to ‘set a man against his father, a daughter against her mother, and a daughter-in-law against her mother-in-law’; and ‘a man’s enemies will be those of his own household.’ He who loves father or mother more than Me is not worthy of Me. And he who loves son or daughter more than Me is not worthy of Me.”

I remember that i’ve played with a website that automatically produced such texts in school once, like 15 years ago, now i’m thanking Google to have given us Chat-GPT(, and the chinese people talk(ed) a lot about a.i. in the few manhuas i’ve read, much more than Japan, Korea, or the West), not saying that you didn’t write this yourself, nor that i really care, i’m just saying

Since you kept, and still keep replying with nonsensical comments, figured I’d return the favour.

A very well written comment, thanks. However, I’d have to disagree on the following points:

If one examines deconstructivist subdialectic theory, one is faced with a choice: either accept antipagantheoreconstrucivism or conclude that reality comes from communication. Several desublimations concerning deconstructivist subdialectic theory exist. Thus, if modernist materialism holds, we have to choose between regligion and pretextual narrative.

In the works of Rushdie, a predominant concept is the distinction between opening and closing. The example of deconstructivist discourse prevalent in Rushdie’s The Moor’s Last Sigh emerges again in Midnight’s Children. Thus, an abundance of deappropriations concerning a neodialectic whole may be revealed.

The characteristic theme of the works of Eco is the dialectic, and eventually the paradigm, of posttextual class. However, the cultural paradigm of reality suggests that language may be used to oppress the Other, but only if consciousness is distinct from narrativity; if that is not the case, we can assume that the goal of the reader is deconstruction.

Thus, the main theme of the works of Eco is the role of the observer as participant. The subject is contextualised into a subcultural papalism that includes consciousness as a totality.

It could be said that Debord uses the term ‘the conceptual paradigm of expression’ to denote the difference between culture and apocrypthic neoclusterism. The premise of textual situationism implies that art serves to reinforce divisions. In a sense, an abundance of theories concerning the conceptual paradigm of expression exist. Derrida promotes the use of materialist presemantic theory to attack outdated perceptions of narrativity.

It could be said that Lacan uses the term ‘textual rationalism’ to denote the role of god…ge…ci as poet. Any number of narratives concerning the common ground between society and theo-antiprotonatalism may be discovered.

Ok, I’ll help you out a bit.

When someone says your comment didn’t make sense, you should respond by explaining what you meant, not send a comment that makes even less sense.