• starman2112@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    Literally all I’m saying is that the vast majority of pit bulls aren’t violent. I fucking said I’m in favor of spaying and neutering the breed out of existence because the few that do become violent are excessively dangerous.

    • ferret@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      10 months ago

      Technically it is disengenuous to say statistically and then make up a statistic

      • starman2112@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Literally all I’m saying is that the vast majority of pit bulls aren’t violent. I fucking said I’m in favor of spaying and neutering the breed out of existence because the few that do become violent are excessively dangerous.

        • themajesticdodo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          Assuming an average lifespan of roughly 10 years, there’s a roughly 1 in 1,000 chance that a given pit bull will ever attack a human or animal.

          So 1 in every 1000 will attack a human? Is that actually a good argument for pit bulls?

          • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            10 months ago

            Its like saying 95% of catholic priests have not molested a child, meaning 1 in 20 definitely have, lol.