End of disussion.

  • Lurker123 [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    If you’re already ceding a descriptivist account of language, arguing that white isn’t a race is probably foreclosed.

    • FanonFan [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      that’s a good point, although if we’re talking about tactics internal consistency isn’t 100% necessary. more important that the rhetoric we choose resonates in the way we intend with the audience we’re engaging with

      “whiteness is the absence of race” is an interesting way of framing it that the average person probably hasn’t thought about before. could then segue into the arbitrary nature of white/nonwhite and how it ties into power structures and class relations. ideally sidesteps defenses and encourages novel/critical thought

      also could avoid internal consistency issues simply by wording it like “the way I like to look at it is…” rather than a strong assertion.

        • FanonFan [comrade/them, any]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          The part you’re quoting isn’t so much about coalition building as it is agitation to try and break through the cultural wall most people are programmed with.

          To me coalition building entails finding common ground between already-existing organizations and movements.

          As a parallel, the Marxism 101 that we agitate with is reductive to the point of inaccuracy, but it’s meant to be an approachable starting point. Similar pedagogical methods for physics and other things, although less ideologically loaded.