• Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I can’t read past the paywall, but it looks like that hashtag was meant to be sarcastic. Denying the Holocaust, praising Hitler, saying racist things… those are not done with sarcasm.

    • meco03211@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      16
      ·
      1 year ago

      Would you accept other hate speech provided it’s qualified as “sarcastic”? How should xitter determine sarcastic messages vs serious ones?

      And saying the entirety of that hashtag was used sarcastically is incredibly presumptuous. How would someone prove to you that it was used at least once seriously?

      • Flying Squid@lemmy.worldOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        16
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        I would say that entirely depends on how it’s worded. This was a parody of another hashtag that was being used sarcastically. I would not call that hate speech in any way. I’m sorry, but “killallmen” is clearly not meant the way the hate speech being allowed on Twitter is meant now. There’s a world of difference. It’s not even comparable.

        • meco03211@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          13
          ·
          1 year ago

          So your original question was “What is left wing hate speech?”

          Regardless of whether it’s comparable or as prevalent as right wing hate speech should be moot. You were provided examples and I showed an instance of it actually occurring.

          Again. Not defending or opposing one side or the other nor commenting or implying some frequency or severity of posts.