• BertramDitore@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    10 months ago

    The bill offers employers flexibility in accruing sick leave. However, by the 200th day of employment, it should amount to five days.

    This is not enough, but it’s a start I guess.

    At my company we tried to negotiate for paid sick leave on top of our meager Paid Time Off (no current distinction) and corporate basically laughed at us. This shit needs to not be optional, and not just in California. Everybody gets sick and/or needs to take care of someone who’s sick. Ignoring that basic fact of life is absurd and inhumane.

      • Rhaedas@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        Corporations are already upset about the push to pay existing workers more money. To have much more paid time off means they’d have to hire more workers to cover those (already run lean) shifts, AND pay them leave time too. Think of the profit loss!

        • tintory@lemm.eeOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          10 months ago

          You mean a decease in Profit Margins

          There profits will increase because more people have more money to spend and time to spend that money

          • Rhaedas@kbin.social
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            10 months ago

            Ha, you’re right, and isn’t it ironic that doing the better thing for everyone ends up being more profitable? It’s almost like they aren’t concerned with the actual value that’s lost, but more the difference between them and everyone else.

            • tintory@lemm.eeOP
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              10 months ago

              Right!!!

              It’s almost always about the abuse of power than the acquisition of wealth itself

              • Rhaedas@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                Back on Reddit I had a very old post reply saved from someone who through his work and connections had an inside view of the “wealthy”, and they broke down the change from money to power as one goes from “just” millionaire to higher up. When money becomes no longer a concern, or rather when obtaining “stuff” (as Carlin would say) is no longer a factor, how much power and influence becomes more of a way to compare one’s wealth to another. It may not even be important anymore on net value if one has a bigger leverage arm on things.

                • tintory@lemm.eeOP
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  10 months ago

                  That’s spot on, and a lot their resistance to any sort of regulation is more out of distaste that the lessers put rules on them and it’s their right to abuse others and the environment

                  Progress can’t be made without that understanding