I did read the article. The contents don’t matter. The title fits the article and should have been used instead of your inflammatory, editorialized one.
Again, slurs? It’s just pathetic you actually think you’re saying something.
Editorialization doesn’t matter when posting a title. The title matches the article, it just wasn’t inflammatory enough for you so you had to completely misrepresent it to fit your narrative.
The article had a title that explicitly states that 6 countries have shown evidence of this, and then your dumb ass decides that means the entire world and changes the whole meaning of the headline because you’re too stupid to understand it.
Maybe read pass the headline removed
How about you don’t use slurs? How about not editorializing headlines to entirely misrepresent the article?
It’s not hard to not be an asshole
Again, you didnt read the article, removed
Again, let’s not use slurs. It’s not that hard.
I did read the article. The contents don’t matter. The title fits the article and should have been used instead of your inflammatory, editorialized one.
Yeah the contents do matter, god damn removed lol
Again, slurs? It’s just pathetic you actually think you’re saying something.
Editorialization doesn’t matter when posting a title. The title matches the article, it just wasn’t inflammatory enough for you so you had to completely misrepresent it to fit your narrative.
Which title? Did an editor write the title? You all should fight for the biggest removed title in the thunder dome.
Jesus Christ, go touch some grass
The article had a title that explicitly states that 6 countries have shown evidence of this, and then your dumb ass decides that means the entire world and changes the whole meaning of the headline because you’re too stupid to understand it.
I think you might be removed. The air particulates are more dangerous than smoking. Doesn’t matter where you are.