Coomer artists, please get to work

  • Trudge [Comrade]
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    1 year ago

    Contrast it with this art comrade. It’s soviet art depicting attractive women of many races in a neutral context, so it’s a great contrast compared to the sexualized BRICS image.

    I’m okay with comrades having sexualized media as a treat, but we must take care to see it for what it is.

    • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      The BRICS image is not “sexualized.” There is not a single thing sexual about it.

      All the women in your image are scandolously showing off their ankles, so maybe your image is “sexualized” too.

      • Trudge [Comrade]
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 year ago

        Women’s bodies aren’t sexual if that’s what you mean. You have some learning to do.

              • Trudge [Comrade]
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                1 year ago

                Another poster already made an extensive comment about exactly how it is sexualized.

                • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Yes, and they’re wrong. India’s pose is no more sexualized than the women in your image showing their ankles, it’s nonsense. I could point to literally any drawing of a human being and find something “sexualized” about it. I see nothing in OP that is actually evocative of sex.

                  • Trudge [Comrade]
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    You purposefully mischaracterize what I’m saying by arguing “ankles, lol” because you don’t actually even believe in what you are saying