Coomer artists, please get to work

        • Trudge [Comrade]
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          Another poster already made an extensive comment about exactly how it is sexualized.

          • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            1 year ago

            Yes, and they’re wrong. India’s pose is no more sexualized than the women in your image showing their ankles, it’s nonsense. I could point to literally any drawing of a human being and find something “sexualized” about it. I see nothing in OP that is actually evocative of sex.

            • Trudge [Comrade]
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              1 year ago

              You purposefully mischaracterize what I’m saying by arguing “ankles, lol” because you don’t actually even believe in what you are saying

                • Trudge [Comrade]
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  By flanderizing my statement as if I was talking about the clothing. Hence, ankles, lol. Explain what you meant by that then.

                  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I was extending your argument to its natural conclusion. If you can point to some random element in OP like India raising a finger and say that that’s somehow sexual, the I can do the same and point to revealing ankles as sexual. I’m not mischaracterizing your position, I’m just demonstrating why I disagree with it.