OnlyFans billboards ruled 'not overtly sexual' by UK ad watchdog
www.euronews.com
Eliza Rose Watson's OnlyFans billboards have been cleared. "If a gambling or alcohol company can run their ads, which have far more devastating impacts, why not me?"
  • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
    341·
    11 months ago

    It’s completely tame. There are far more sexual images in just about any direction. It’s only because people know there’s actual nakedness being advertised that anyone has a problem with it. And that’s just silly.

          • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.eeEnglish
            111·
            11 months ago

            She’s advertising her ability to titillate, not her personality or intrinsic value and self-worth. Even with your edit, you’re still equating the persona she adopts for her business with her value as a person.

              • Moobythegoldensock@lemm.eeEnglish
                7·
                11 months ago

                Projecting much?

                I don’t have any personal desire to do any sex work. But women who are less conventionally attractive or who don’t feel confident on camera are not any less valuable than those who do. You’re equating a woman’s value as a human to her sex appeal and that’s disgusting.

              • Arrakis@lemmy.worldEnglish
                41·
                11 months ago

                Wow, you really went directly from “possibly just a poorly written comment” to “actually is just an absolute removed”, didn’t you?