• IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    71
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    10 months ago

    This does sound like appeasement. If I buy a book, be it a copy of the Koran, 50 Shades of Gray, or anything else then it’s my property and I should be able to do with it as I wish. If someone else gets offended, that shouldn’t be my problem.

    We shouldn’t tolerate the intolerant.

    • Cethin@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      I somewhat agree, but there should probably be instances where it’s not allowed, similar to hate speech. I’m not sure how Danish law deals with hate speech, but I’d bet speech isn’t allowed all the time. If the goal is to induce violence or anger, that should maybe be prevented in some instances.

      • Thoth19@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        15
        ·
        10 months ago

        But didn’t this recent influx of burnings start when an Iranian refugee burned the quaran in protest against the government he fled from? This doesn’t seem to have anything to do with skin color.

    • ComradeKhoumrag@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      10 months ago

      What do you think of “no burning any books” That way it’s not about catering to a religion, and if you burn a book in your home who’s really gonna stop you