• Questy@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    47
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    Perhaps provide some air superiority to back up those suggestions of force concentration?

        • SkyezOpen@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          7
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          10 months ago

          From scratch, sure, but surely am already trained pilot would take significantly less time to learn a new airframe?

          • sunbeam60@lemmy.one
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            10 months ago

            It isn’t just about flying a plane.

            You’ve got to be certified in each weapon the planes are supplied with. You’ve got to learn the doctrines, then shift to the doctrines, that the planes were built for.

            Then you’ve got to resupply the planes. Maintain them. Fix them. Service them. Store them. Debug them. Keep them in the air.

            There’s a massive logistical challenge to integrating F-16s into Ukraine.

            • BilboBargains@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              10 months ago

              Who knew it would be so difficult and time consuming to learn how to fly around and do a bit of pew-pew. I thought it was more like getting in the car and driving to the shop, but with bombs.

          • selokichtli@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            10 months ago

            From scratch it would take several years. At least in my country, to train a pilot you have to go to the Military Air Force School to complete an 8 semester long career that won’t necessarily grant you a position as a pilot. Of course, with constrained times of war, this can be achieved in less than 4 years, but 1 year seems like a stretch. Now, if you have a vast disposal of trained pilots, I guess you can make it in one year or even less, depending on several factors. The problem is I don’t find stats about this case, and even if there are a lot of Ukrainian pilots ready to fly, they are probably not seasoned in combat.

  • ElHexo [comrade/them]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    10 months ago

    American officials’ criticisms of Ukraine’s counteroffensive are often cast through the lens of a generation of military officers who have never experienced a war of this scale and intensity.

  • Blursty
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    11
    ·
    10 months ago

    U.S. Officials Say they Misallocated Ukraine’s Forces and Firepower

    Title without the passive voice.

    • Alto@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      10 months ago

      I’m going to go off on a limb and say they wouldn’t be if it weren’t already well known by the enemy

    • lilcreacher@literature.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      I think its definitely too early to say whether or not any particular element of either Russia or Ukraine’s strategy in the war has been ‘viable’ at this point in time. The ultimate long-term effects of either side’s major strategic decisions are probably difficult to understand right now even for the ones who have been making them, let alone for outside observers such as ourselves.

      We can at least acknowledge that Bakhmut was the culminating point of Russian offensive operations in the Donbas. Would it have been the culminating point of their offensive if Ukrainians didn’t defend it so fiercely? Who can say. Both Russian and Ukrainian forces were heavily attrited in the battle there - will this benefit Russia or Ukraine more? Who can say. There are ‘conventional wisdom’ answers to both of these questions, but the nature of the fog of war is such that even small, seemingly unrelated developments can drastically alter the valence of what was previously established as strategically advantageous for one side or vice versa.

      Even when institutions dedicated to the study of warfare attempt to analyze utilized strategy X versus counterfactual strategy Y from some episode of military history, the debates are often unending. So can’t you see how cringe it is to claim as a layman that it should’ve been obvious to a given commander (and at runtime, too, despite the fact that you’re making the criticism with the benefit of hindsight) that strategy Z would have been clearly superior to whatever it was they thought was best, back then?

    • severien@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      32
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      This article reminds me how Russia could prevent the war by not invading. They can also stop war any time by simply going home. We should be clear on the fact that Russia is solely responsible for every single second of this war.

      • ToastyWaffle
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        10 months ago

        History started Feb 24th 2022 and nothing had ever happened before then.

        “they can just go home” genius brilliant take.

        • severien@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          10 months ago

          Things happened, yeah, Russia invaded Ukraine twice before - in 2014 and 2015. Not sure what’s your point, though.

    • Sirosky@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      10 months ago

      Unnecessarily reductionist/antagonistic. If you had read the article, you would’ve known that the Ukrainians themselves agree with the point. And despite what the title says, the U.S. isn’t the only of Ukrainian’s western partners that thinks a change of strategy in order. This war might be fought primarily by the Ukrainians, but it’s also very clearly a collective responsibility of the western world order.

      • TokenBoomer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        The truth will never be reductionist.

        collective responsibility of the western world order.

        ie- capitalist imperialism.