In light of recent events and confusion, I think we would all benefit from having a single, concise definition for the word tankie. Here are my suggestions:
-
Someone who believes that violence has a proper use and that that use isn’t “getting bananas for my tum tum”
-
Some dumbass Kremlin bot who thinks that Russia is a country rather than an actual duchy of hell
-
A Neo-Shermanist
-
A fascist in every way, except the ones that matter and also the other ones
-
A hysterical CCP bot who lacks our sensible, rules-based policy of zero-tolerance for the Chinese
-
A MAGAt who thinks that Drumpf was neither the beginning nor the end of our problems, and who thinks it’s funny - FUNNY, I SAY - that we’re so caught up on him
-
A non-conservative who is mean to me about my opinions
-
Mom, systematically repressing me with a fascist so-called bedtime 😡
Idk if I’m a tankie. I know a lot of the stuff we heard about USSR was lies in the form of propaganda, so I assume a lot of what we hear about China and North Korea is the same.
By the definition of a lot of lemmyverse libs you’re 100% a tankie
According to what I’ve seen, even entertaining doubt at the validity of unsourced claims by Western media and state departments makes you a tankie.
If you cite the cia on Soviet caloric intake you’re also a tankie
And if you cite the CIA on whether Stalin was an all-powerful dictator, you’re a super-tankie
You would be correct. Very much recommend the Blowback podcast, it’s a wild ride.
It’s got H. Jon Benjamin! A little bit of fun between the horrors!