He. Tried. To. Kill. You.

  • panchzila@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Many laws are based on practical reasons. Forbidding a criminal to run for president is one. Or will you be ok if for example Putin ran for the american presidency letting the people decide?

    • DarthBueller@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’d say that choosing a foreign-born person as your example is inaccurate because the US Constitution requires the President to be born on US soil. But seeing that the last time the Republicans put forward a foreign-born US national as a presidential contender, everyone glossed over the issue, and only ivory-tower types wondered about the Constitutional issue (e.g., who even has standing, as the concept is currently understood, to enforce the provision?) perhaps your hypothetical is right on point.

    • Tilted@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I’m fine with reasonable limits on who can run. I don’t agree with letting politicians freely decide who can run by passing laws.

    • chakan2@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      1 year ago

      For us to call ourselves a free nation, you have to allow someone deplorable a full and fair election…it fucking sucks, but that’s a cornerstone of the foundation of democracy and freedom.