• Trudge [Comrade]
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    23
    arrow-down
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Three million dead due to the Afghanistan war alone wasn’t brutal enough for you?

    The systematic, institutional rape and torture of men, women, and children in Abu Ghraib was more brutal than anything defined in Sharia law but we still pretend that the occupation was clean.

    • Smoogy@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      34
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Both can be wrong, Sounds like you’re just here to derail into having a different conversation you want to have entirely separate to the topic rather than addressing the actual topic.

      • Trudge [Comrade]
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        23
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        I’m staying on topic.

        I am demonstrating how the American occupational forces handed out harsher punishments and consequences than the Taliban did, yet couldn’t curb opium production. Ergo, the Americans were never interested in curbing opium production.

        • bluGill@kbin.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          17
          arrow-down
          5
          ·
          1 year ago

          The Americans didn’t intend to kill all those people. They intended to kill soldiers, and lots of other people who they deemed evil, but growing drugs was never deemed evil enough to be worth killing someone over. The Taliban intended to kill those growing drugs, along with a lot of other people doing things they deem to be evil I’ll leave moral judgements to you.

        • Julian@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          1 year ago

          I mean my takeaway would be that the us shouldn’t slaughter and torture people, not that they should have slaughtered and tortored more people to curb opium production.

    • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      the US didn’t go to Afghanistan to combat the opium trade. thanks for the false equivalence, though.

      • 4xdegrees@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        1 year ago

        So all those DEA guys, FDA folks teaching wheat farming, millions of pounds of drugs burned, raids we conducted to “combat opium traffickers”, and all the reports we were fed about how we are responsible for eradicating Afghan opium all means what, exactly? What were we (and Myself, personally) doing there, again?

        • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          So all those DEA guys, FDA folks teaching wheat farming,

          hilarious. you should do stand-up.

          so, you’re claiming, without evidence I might add, that people from the DEA and hehehe… the FDA were teaching wheat farming to the Afghani people? The DEA and FDA. And you expect anyone to take you seriously? lmao

          and all the reports we were fed about how we are responsible for eradicating Afghan opium

          what reports? let’s see these alleged “reports”

          What were we (and Myself, personally) doing there, again?

          I have no idea what you were doing there, and if you think this is what was happening, I seriously doubt you were ever there at all.

            • adroit balloon@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              9
              arrow-down
              4
              ·
              1 year ago

              aww, look at you, with your tantrums and your insults because you have no facts to back up your claims.

              and look! you even have a link that contains exactly nothing that backs up your claims. funny how you insult my reading comprehension, but if yours wasn’t so terrible, you’d see that for yourself. it’s cute how angry you are.

              sleep well.

    • thefartographer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unscholy_source is referring to domestically. US can’t adopt wholesale murder of drug-users because it doesn’t benefit the dealer to kill their clientele. Plus, it’s super-cool to kill and torture people from the middle-east because we don’t like the way they pray to their invisible friend.

    • pjhenry1216@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Are you suggesting since the US did that, they should institute unconstitutional laws in the US as well? Your argument is seriously that they did some bad things so let’s do worse?

    • bobman@unilem.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      What’s defined in sharia law and what its proponents engage in are two very different things.

      We all know muslim supporters of sharia engage in far more atrocities than whatever you can cherrypick about American soldiers.