“Direct air capture is expensive, unproven, and will ultimately make almost no difference in reducing climate pollution… Capturing just a quarter of our annual carbon emissions would require all of the power currently generated in the country.”

  • sbv@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    The unproven technology has been a key focus of oil and gas lobbyists, who argue that fossil fuel companies can continue their planet-heating extraction activities if plants are built to remove the pollution they cause.

    these guys

    • jimmydoreisalefty@lemmus.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      11 months ago

      Yep. The main thing is profit over people.

      Investing into nuclear would be better in the long term. We have gone a long way in improving fail safes and reusing the waste.