spez@sh.itjust.works to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 months agoAnon uses arch btwsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square193fedilinkarrow-up11.32Karrow-down147
arrow-up11.27Karrow-down1imageAnon uses arch btwsh.itjust.worksspez@sh.itjust.works to > Greentext@lemmy.mlEnglish · 11 months agomessage-square193fedilink
minus-squareOgygus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down62·11 months agoWhat do you mean they? He clearly says he’s a singular person
minus-squareHolyDuckTurtle@kbin.sociallinkfedilinkarrow-up27arrow-down2·edit-211 months agoThey is, and has been for a very long time, perfectly valid for singular use. Most people I’ve encounted do it all the time without noticing between sentences.
minus-squareOgygus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down4·11 months agoIt’s extremely confusing. Its a he, no doubt
minus-squareLazaroFilm@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up17arrow-down2·11 months agoWhere you you see a gender qualifier in the post? If you don’t know you don’t assume because you turn into a donkey or something like that.
minus-squareOgygus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down5·11 months agoA gender what? How is there a doubt that it’s a he.
minus-squareLazaroFilm@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 months agoI doubt. What tells you it’s a he… that’s what I’m asking you to do. Show me, prove me it’s a he.
minus-squareOgygus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·11 months agoHe uses thinkpad, what more proof do you want
minus-squareLazaroFilm@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoWow. You’re dumb and sexist. Have a good live buddy.
minus-squareOgygus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·11 months agoGood *life And thanks, i will
minus-squarelemmonade@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up11·11 months agowhat? where? look at the username, that’s clearly anonymous, the hacker group.
minus-squareOgygus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·11 months agoYou mean the hacker known as four chen
minus-squareHadriscus@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up13arrow-down2·11 months agoIn english, they stands for both plural and gender-neural (when you don’t know whether the person you’re referring to is male or female).
minus-squareOgygus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down3·11 months agoThere no doubt that it’s a male speaking
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down1·11 months agoThey has been used to refer to an unspecified individual since before you were born.
minus-squareOgygus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down2·11 months agoWhat you mean unspecified? It says right there
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·11 months agoThat’s not really the point.
minus-squareSurface_Detail@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up8arrow-down2·edit-211 months ago There’s not a man I meet but doth salute me As if I were their well-acquainted friend A comedy of errors, act IV, scene 3
What do you mean they?
He clearly says he’s a singular person
They is, and has been for a very long time, perfectly valid for singular use.
Most people I’ve encounted do it all the time without noticing between sentences.
It’s extremely confusing. Its a he, no doubt
Where you you see a gender qualifier in the post? If you don’t know you don’t assume because you turn into a donkey or something like that.
A gender what?
How is there a doubt that it’s a he.
I doubt. What tells you it’s a he… that’s what I’m asking you to do. Show me, prove me it’s a he.
He uses thinkpad, what more proof do you want
Wow. You’re dumb and sexist. Have a good live buddy.
Good *life
And thanks, i will
what? where? look at the username, that’s clearly anonymous, the hacker group.
You mean the hacker known as four chen
In english, they stands for both plural and gender-neural (when you don’t know whether the person you’re referring to is male or female).
There no doubt that it’s a male speaking
You do you
Thanks, i will
They has been used to refer to an unspecified individual since before you were born.
What you mean unspecified?
It says right there
That’s not really the point.
A comedy of errors, act IV, scene 3