• falsem@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    You’re conflating FOSS and open source. This is open source just not FOSS anymore

    • Baut [she/her] auf.@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      This is plainly incorrect, please see the other responses.
      FOSS stands for “free and open source software”, but they functionally mean the same thing. So what you’re saying is:

      This is open source just not open source anymore

        • Baut [she/her] auf.@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          I don’t get what you’re trying to say here. All terms used have a clear definition and other comments pointed that out already. The definition on open source is very clear.

        • Baut [she/her] auf.@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 year ago

          So your claim is that the open source definition by the Open Source Initiative which is battle tested and widely used by distributions, major git hosts and legal enitities is a cherry-picked definition?
          Sounds like you’re cherry-picking your definition to hide that you simply have no idea :)