It says “First Amendment” right in the title. The subtitle is:
Trump’s lawyers plan to argue he had a First Amendment right to subvert the 2020 election. He didn’t.
Paragraph two is:
“This is an attack on free speech and political advocacy,” Trump attorney John Lauro told CNN Tuesday evening. In a separate appearance on Fox News, Lauro claimed that Trump is being prosecuted for “what he believed in and the policies and the political speech that he carried out as president.”
The whole point of this article is that they’re going to argue that overturning an election has everything to do with free speech.
…overturning an election has nothing to do with free speech.
It says “First Amendment” right in the title. The subtitle is:
Paragraph two is:
The whole point of this article is that they’re going to argue that overturning an election has everything to do with free speech.
And I’m saying that’s exceedingly dumb
Correct, which is why the lawyers’ argument is invalid.
Yup, agreed
did you read the article??
I’m responding to this specific comment. I agree that the argument Trump’s lawyers are attempting to make is incredibly stupid.
I see what you mean now, my bad bro
No worries man, it’s my bad. Seems like lots of people misunderstood so that’s on me for not being clearer.