deleted by creator
That’s certainly a way to look at it. Not wrong either.
Pretty par for the economist. Not the same take as every other news outlet, not exactly the take I agree with on all points, but not totally wrong either.
deleted by creator
*swing state voters
We also get to see how badly he loses the popular vote.
Currently looks unlikely 😓
Guilty.
The main problem with that analogy is that juries hear all the evidence before making their decision.
But MAGA voters will never hear the facts on these cases, because they live exclusively in a media bubble that feeds them lies and truly moronic conspiracy theories.
This country is not okay.
The main problem with that analogy is that juries hear all the evidence before making their decision.
No. They are SUPPOSED to hear all the evidence. Reality and expectation are different things.
Voters are supposed to hear all of the facts. But reality and expectation are different things.
The analogy works great.
I don’t think you understand how real juries work, then.
Oh ya? Tell that to Oj Simpson after getting away with murder.
They all heard the all the evidence.
Dead link.
Fixed. Thanks
Link is still dead or dead again homie.
Tf is wrong with me
(read to the tune of The Pink Panther)
Article is paywalled after two paragraphs
The Economist always has one eye on the bottom line.