I’ve seen a lot of recommends for Immich on here, so I have an idea what the answer here is going to be, but I’m looking for some comparisons between it and Photoprism I’m currently using Synology Photos, and I think my biggest issue is it’s lack of metadata management. I’ve gotten around that with MetaImage and NeoFinder. I’m considering moving to something not tied to the Synology environment.

  • butter@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    In the sense that immich warns not be the only way to store your pictures, while Photoprism advertises as a bug-free program, that adds new features very slowly in order to be bug free.

    • cevn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Maybe, but why would you store your images in only one place to begin with?

      • butter@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        I like to have 1 folder with all my pictures that is syncthing’d to another computer and a cloud provider

        • cevn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Seems like a decent strategy, I use syncthing for a long time with no problems! Maybe a spare hard drive too? Can never be too sure…

    • Jvrava9@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      You are right about this, it does not bother me tho as I already use rolling release software like Artix

        • tiwenty@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          Makes sense. Though if one wants security maybe it’s better to use something like PhotoSync to copy the photos through FTP/anything and mount the volume RO.