• snooggums@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    It is a violation until it goes to scotus who will say that it doesn’t apply just like with the precedent of Roe v Wade and that made up case about a website for a gay couple.

    • SCB@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      I definitely understand the sentiment, but this is literally written into the constitution - the others are reinterpretations of former decisions

      They’re both bullshit, and one didn’t even have standing, but they’re much easier to “justify”