• Flying Squid@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    259
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    You watch. They will only take his congressional seat from his cold, dead hands. He would have to be a drooling vegetable.

    Anyway, if Democrats won’t get rid of Feinstein, Republicans sure as hell won’t get rid of McConnell.

    • Artemis@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      138
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      It’s going to take these old assholes dropping dead in the Capitol before we start doing anything but removed about the ages of our congresspeople. And yes, anyone selfish enough run for re-election when they’re over the age of 70 is an asshole in my book

      • Chainweasel@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        88
        ·
        1 year ago

        Strom Thurmond was wheeled into the Senate in his hospital bed at 99 years old and died in office in 2003, didn’t change a thing.

      • kescusay@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        71
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        1 year ago

        It’s not really about age. There are plenty of older people who are still functioning fine. Hell, Biden is almost as old as Mitch, but he’s physically fit and doesn’t go into fugue states. (And the claims that his stutter and verbal gaffs are evidence of decline are utter bullshit. He’s been that way his entire life.)

        Where we’re fucking up is that we don’t have any systems in place to require our elected officials or candidates to be mentally sound. We should require people running for or in elected office to pass cognitive tests the same way we require people on the roads to pass driving tests. Yes, more of the elderly will fail those tests because age is a factor, but the focus should be on “can this person do the job,” not “is this person too old.”

        Mitch might be someone who’d be removed from office with a test like that, but it would also potentially catch young guys with catastrophic mental health issues, like Herschel Walker, who got frighteningly close to public office while showing blatant signs of illness.

        • treefrog@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          ·
          1 year ago

          An independent health exam to determine cognitive fitness every year you serve in public office once you’re over 65 was my thought when I saw this news last night.

          It wouldn’t have stopped Walker but it would take care of McConnell and Finnstein. As well as any Supreme Court Justices that go that way.

          • minorcoma@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            23
            ·
            1 year ago

            This would be terribly abused. Imagine who Republicans would shoehorn in there based off their Supreme Court picks…

            • NJSpradlin@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              31
              ·
              1 year ago

              Gods, remember the doctor that gave Trump his physical during his original campaign? The best health, the fittest adult male imaginable. That guy should have had his medical license stripped.

            • treefrog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              Shoehorn into the Supreme Court?

              They already factor age into lifetime appointments.l with nominations (look at the median age of Trump’s appointments). I don’t see how requiring public servants be cognitively fit to serve and making them prove it if they’re getting on in years can be abused here.

                • treefrog@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  That is an issue which is why we’d need an independent agency and transparency.

                  And yes, that means this would be public medical information. Want the right to medical privacy, resign. It’s a requirement of the position post 65 that you wave that right in this instance.

                  • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    I agree with all of that, except it should be for every person holding an elected position at that level.

                    Younger people can be mentally impacted by a host of issues, and, on the flip side, any whiff of ageism should be avoided.

                    So just make it a universal precondition.

            • treefrog@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              1 year ago

              She probably is emotionally unstable (along with MTG) but that’s much different than cognitive decline/fitness.

              • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                1 year ago

                She barely passed the GED on her 3rd try. Decline? She’s never risen above the bottom of the mountain. And she’s never been fit for office.

                • 30isthenew29@lemm.ee
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  2
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  Think of all the outrage it would cause people getting declared ‘unfit’. People would definitely think there is double play going on…

                  • Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    5
                    ·
                    1 year ago

                    Just like a lot of ideas that seem like they’d be good for government only work until the Right Wing (whichever party they’re corrupting, over the decades and centuries) gets ahold of them. Remember the poll tests they used against Black people to prevent them from voting. And think about how they’d slash and burn the funding for a National Healthcare System in order to cut taxes further for the wealthy. You can’t base the system on a premise that the people running it will have the good of the country at heart, you have to design it to prevent evil abuse of its power.

            • paintbucketholder@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              1 year ago

              Just like any system in existence.

              I’m still not sure that “let’s do nothing and hope for the best” is the best approach in a society where people now live so long that mental decline affects a much larger percentage of the population than it did in 1776.

        • ManosTheHandsOfFate@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          1 year ago

          I think it would be completely reasonable to put an upper age limit on elected officials - say you can’t run after 75. You can run right before 75 and serve as an elected official for a few more years, but after that you’re done.

      • Nowyn@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 year ago

        My question is why are Americans electing them? While we have a similar age group structure, if anything our median age is larger, middle age of our parliament is little bit over 47 years.

    • G_Wash1776@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      29
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      1 year ago

      Both parties should agree they’ll force McConnell to step down if Feinstein is also forced to step down.

    • zpm@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 year ago

      A lot of these guys want to be zipping around in those beeping, star trek chairs. Just a room full of beeps as they still try and “talk” over each other.

    • SulaymanF@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Republicans are more likely to drop McConnell than Dems are to drop Feinstein before 2024. Trump keeps blasting on McConnell and turned the MAGA crowd against him.