• ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    9 months ago

    There are some, but most are closed and especially top end ones like Claude, ChatGPT, and Gemini. Meanwhile, Chinese companies are now increasingly releasing their top end models with no strings attached.

    • combat_brandonism [they/them]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      idk about the Chinese companies but in the case of facebook it’s a pretty naked case of commoditizing their complements, not some altruistic play at positive-sum technobloomerism

      the cheaper slop generation gets the better it is for facebook, the slop platform. it’s weird that google hasn’t made the same decision

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆OP
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        9 months ago

        There doesn’t need to be any altruistic intent here. Facebook released their models because they fell behind OpenAI, and they realized that they could compete in selling them as a service. So, they pivoted to treating models like a commodity as you note. It still leads to a positive-sum cooperation scenario however regardless of the underlying intent.

        Fundamentally, there’s a competition between two business models here. Google, Anthropic, and OpenAI think they can stay far enough ahead with their proprietary models that they can continue to sell them as subscription services. Meanwhile, other companies don’t see models as a direct source of revenue, and see them as a tool building platform.