fossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agoConversing with Mathematiciansmander.xyzimagemessage-square51fedilinkarrow-up1366arrow-down111
arrow-up1355arrow-down1imageConversing with Mathematiciansmander.xyzfossilesque@mander.xyzM to Science Memes@mander.xyzEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square51fedilink
minus-squaresevenappleslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2arrow-down3·2 months agoThat’s not how the square root is defined. You’re confusing “square root of 100” with “the answer to x^2 = 100”. These are different things.
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4arrow-down1·2 months agoWhich is why I differentiated between square roots and the principle square root by saying the square roots instead of the square root on the second comment.
minus-squaresevenappleslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down4·2 months agoso you came up with your own term to cover your mistake?
minus-squareDalvoron@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoNope, everything they said is well established and correct
minus-squareJackbyDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·1 month agoNo, I was being pedantic to appease the pedantic assholes.
That’s not how the square root is defined.
You’re confusing “square root of 100” with “the answer to x^2 = 100”. These are different things.
Which is why I differentiated between square roots and the principle square root by saying the square roots instead of the square root on the second comment.
so you came up with your own term to cover your mistake?
Nope, everything they said is well established and correct
Oops, my bad
No, I was being pedantic to appease the pedantic assholes.