it’s too early to tell, most of them have terrible optics but Hinkle does have the optics that are seen well in the US (white, traditionally attractive and in shape basically) and you can see it on his number of followers and the attention Russia has given to him.
I’m not deeply into Patsoc ideology, but they seem like conservatives with better geopolitical positions. Sure, you can support Patsocs against “classic” conservatives and right-wingers if you want.
That said, as of right now, Magacommunism is a political footnote, and I don’t see the point in boosting or supporting them in any way when you could instead support real left-wing projects or people.
Make no mistake, Magacommunism is reactionary, but if it weakens or undermines U.S. hegemony, it might be worth supporting it against the Democrats or Republicans. We are far from Patsocs being a large movement though, and at the moment, your time is, in my opinion, better spent supporting anything that is actually left-wing.
it’s too early to tell, most of them have terrible optics but Hinkle does have the optics that are seen well in the US (white, traditionally attractive and in shape basically) and you can see it on his number of followers and the attention Russia has given to him.
I’m not deeply into Patsoc ideology, but they seem like conservatives with better geopolitical positions. Sure, you can support Patsocs against “classic” conservatives and right-wingers if you want.
That said, as of right now, Magacommunism is a political footnote, and I don’t see the point in boosting or supporting them in any way when you could instead support real left-wing projects or people.
Make no mistake, Magacommunism is reactionary, but if it weakens or undermines U.S. hegemony, it might be worth supporting it against the Democrats or Republicans. We are far from Patsocs being a large movement though, and at the moment, your time is, in my opinion, better spent supporting anything that is actually left-wing.
Agree, my perspective is different since i am not americano and due to that i am more biased towards foreign policy than internal policy.