• purahna
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    10 months ago

    Much more dangerous than negotiating a ceasefire.

    • TransplantedSconie@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      With who? Russia? Lmao. Fuck that. Shoot them all and drive them back into that cesspool they call a county.

      • purahna
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        How many dead Ukrainians is Luhansk and Donetsk worth? How many dead Ukrainians is it worth to thrash against a multipolar world for another couple years? Fifty thousand? A hundred? Two? The price doesn’t really matter to the beneficiaries, the beneficiaries aren’t the ones to pay for it, but it’s a good question to think about nonetheless. I personally want fewer dead Ukrainians, but you’re entitled to your own feelings too.

    • coffeetest@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Safer than negotiating a ceasefire as a theory, maybe. Safer than negotiating a ceasefire with the RF? No.

    • flying_monkies@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 months ago

      Your one correct statement in this thread: Negotiating a peace with Russians is more dangerous than anything that happens in the war zone

    • severien@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      10 months ago

      Only giving Putin time to re-arm and attack again.

      Putin doesn’t want to stop the war, if he wanted, he could simply pull back to Russia.