u/parwa - originally from r/GenZhou
I know this is more of a Dengist sub than a Maoist one, but I was hoping I could find some insight here as it’s a book I’ve seen praised across many leftist tendencies. I read through some sections of it recently (mostly skipped over the historical stuff because I knew about most of it already) and while I went in with an open mind I’m really torn on it. I’m mostly just unsure of what the conclusion is. If revolution must be led by the colonized, where does that leave everyone else that wants a revolution? Are descendants of settlers supposed to just sit back and wait? Besides, just in terms of pure numbers isn’t that nearly impossible? From my understanding you need mass support to pull off a successful revolution, not just a fraction of the population. I don’t want to just write it off as an op as I’ve seen many others do, because it has some good points, yet I can’t help but think it might be. It seems like both a great way to get people of color to distrust white leftists and refuse to organize with them, and to get white leftists to refrain from organizing in fear of speaking over the colonized. I also feel like it kinda fails to take manufactured consent into account. What are your thoughts on it?
u/Chaindealer666999 - originally from r/GenZhouRead fanon. My interpretation of settlers was quit being a white chauvinist loser and go help people because the revolution is being led by the global south, the colonized and diasporas and as white people and colonizers we need to help support them. Essentially stop being shitty to people and feeling superior in your seat of privilege.
I could also be totally wrong.
[deleted] - originally from r/GenZhou[removed]
u/parentis_shotgun - originally from r/GenZhouYes we do.
u/Chaindealer666999 - originally from r/GenZhouWhat did it say?
u/parentis_shotgun - originally from r/GenZhouSome bullshit about how those of us who have read it “can’t agree on its conclusions”.