u/parwa - originally from r/GenZhou
I know this is more of a Dengist sub than a Maoist one, but I was hoping I could find some insight here as it’s a book I’ve seen praised across many leftist tendencies. I read through some sections of it recently (mostly skipped over the historical stuff because I knew about most of it already) and while I went in with an open mind I’m really torn on it. I’m mostly just unsure of what the conclusion is. If revolution must be led by the colonized, where does that leave everyone else that wants a revolution? Are descendants of settlers supposed to just sit back and wait? Besides, just in terms of pure numbers isn’t that nearly impossible? From my understanding you need mass support to pull off a successful revolution, not just a fraction of the population. I don’t want to just write it off as an op as I’ve seen many others do, because it has some good points, yet I can’t help but think it might be. It seems like both a great way to get people of color to distrust white leftists and refuse to organize with them, and to get white leftists to refrain from organizing in fear of speaking over the colonized. I also feel like it kinda fails to take manufactured consent into account. What are your thoughts on it?

  • archive_botOPB
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 years ago

    u/parentis_shotgun - originally from r/GenZhou
    Yes we do.

    • archive_botOPB
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      5 years ago

      u/Chaindealer666999 - originally from r/GenZhou
      What did it say?

      • archive_botOPB
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        5 years ago

        u/parentis_shotgun - originally from r/GenZhou
        Some bullshit about how those of us who have read it “can’t agree on its conclusions”.