~/.local/bin

sure, 7 months ago

I would assume that’s something in the bios settings if it exists. But I could be wrong.

Maybe this: https://forums.linuxmint.com/viewtopic.php?t=371122

Yeah, basically your DE will be the default of the distro. I’ve never had good luck with KDE above Centos 7. But I’m good with Gnome. I’m not saying it’s not possible, but it’s not worth my time and effort personally.

I used Rocky 9 at home for a while. I think I had an emergency with a disk and had to install fedora because it’s all I had. I also use Rocky 8 workstations at work without any problem.

I could easily slip back to Rocky over Fedora no problem. But I don’t game or do anything except serve ipa.

Edit: and yes these were/are my daily driver desktops.

angry upvote

some partitions are useful. Keeping /var and /tmp separate can stop DoS attacks by now allowing logs to fill the entire drive /home means you can wipe the / partition and keep user data.

Could also be going to sleep for power saving.

Might be in reference to snap stores.

This is fedora, I would stick with firewalld.

sudo dnf install firewalld

sudo systemctl enable --now firewalld

sudo firewalld-cmd --add-service --permanent ssh

sudo firewalld-cmd --add-service --permanent https

sudo firewalld-cmd --add-service --permanent http

sudo systemctl restart firewalld

Same for me.

This is the first thing I thought of as well. It’s never been “just use what you want”. It got better for a while as JavaScript and CSS normalized. Now it’s trash again.

How is there always an xkcd for something?

https://pi-hole.net/

It’s a network level ad-blocker by blocking at the DNS level.

It was originally meant to run on a raspberry pi, but will run in docker or other Linux os as well. Very light weight and a great self-host project. Been running for years and support via patreon.

you aren’t talking about the Monty Hall problem then

There are more infinite real numbers between 0 and 1 than whole numbers.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Countable_set

deleted by creator

But the issue is that by switching doors, you have a 66% chance of winning, it doesn’t drop to 50% just because there are 2 doors, it’s still 33% on the first door, 66% on the other doors (as a whole), for which we know one is not correct and won’t choose.

I found the easiest way to think about it as if there are 10 doors, you choose 1, then 8 other doors are opened. Do you stay with your first choice, or the other remaining door? Or scale up to 100. Then you really see the advantage of swapping doors. You have a higher probability when choosing the last remaining door than of having correctly choosen the correct door the first time.

Edit: More generically, it’s set theory, where the initial set of doors is 1 and (n-1). In the end you are shown n-2 doors out of the second set, but the probability of having selected the correct door initially is 1/n. You can think of it as switching your choice to all of the initial (n-1) doors for a probability of (n-1)/n.

I have a 2019 car and I think it’s now a warning light, but I do have a useless gauge for what my current mpg is that I would gladly swap with.